European and Israeli software companies entering the US market don't just need a VP Sales. They need someone who can build the playbook from scratch with no resources and no brand recognition.
The US market is the largest enterprise software market in the world, and for a European or Israeli software company that has found product-market fit at home, the logic of expansion is obvious. What is not obvious — and what costs companies months of runway and millions in misallocated capital — is how to hire the GTM leadership that will actually make the expansion work.
We've run US expansion searches for companies from the UK, France, Germany, Israel, the Netherlands, and beyond. The mistakes are remarkably consistent. This is what we've learned.
A European leadership team looking to hire their first US sales leader often gravitates toward candidates from companies they recognize — Salesforce, SAP, Oracle, Workday. The logic is understandable. These companies are known quantities, their training programs are rigorous, and their alumni have brand equity.
The problem is that large enterprise software companies produce a specific type of sales leader — one who has operated with an enormous support system, a recognized brand, a mature SDR pipeline, and a product that buyers are already educated on. When that person steps into a company that has none of those things, they often find themselves structurally unable to succeed. The playbook they know doesn't apply.
The right candidate for a US expansion hire has a different profile: they've operated in environments where they had to build from scratch, create the pipeline themselves, sell without brand recognition, and still produce results. That candidate is harder to find and often comes from less obvious places.
US OTE structures are materially different from European compensation norms. A strong enterprise sales leader in the US market expects a total compensation package that reflects the risk they're taking — often significantly higher base salaries, aggressive variable targets, and equity that is actually meaningful. Companies that benchmark against European compensation data will consistently lose the candidates they want to the companies that understand US market rates.
This doesn't mean you need to pay whatever the market demands. It means you need to understand the market before you start the search so you can design a compensation structure that competes. A search firm with genuine US market data can calibrate this for you before you make your first offer.
The buyer profile in your home market is often not the same as the buyer profile in the US market, even for the same product category. The US enterprise buyer has different procurement processes, different vendor preferences, different decision-making structures, and different price sensitivity.
Your first US GTM leader needs to understand this translation problem intuitively — not just be told about it. They need to be able to look at your existing product, your existing customer base in Europe, and construct a hypothesis about where the US market analogs are and how to reach them. That is a specific skill, and it's worth testing for explicitly in the interview process.
One of the most underestimated challenges in cross-border expansion is the management dynamic. A US sales leader reporting to a European CEO or CRO faces a structural challenge: time zone gaps, cultural differences in communication style, and a constant risk of misalignment on priorities.
The right candidate has experience navigating this dynamic. They've worked for international companies, they understand how to build trust with a remote leadership team, and they're comfortable operating with significant autonomy. Candidates who have only ever worked in tightly integrated local teams often struggle with the isolation that comes with being the first US hire.
After dozens of cross-border expansion searches, the profile that consistently works looks something like this:
This is not a unicorn profile, but it's also not a broadly available one. Finding it requires a specific sourcing strategy — not a job posting, not a database search, but a systematic market mapping exercise that surfaces candidates who aren't actively looking and who might not be an obvious fit on paper.
For PE-backed companies running US expansion searches, the sponsor's network is often underutilized. PE operating partners and platform teams frequently have portfolio relationships, co-investor networks, and operating executive communities that can surface qualified candidates faster than a cold search. A search firm that knows how to work within that ecosystem can compress the timeline meaningfully.
At the same time, the sponsor's involvement in the final hiring decision should be calibrated carefully. The US GTM leader will ultimately be working with the portfolio company's local leadership, not the sponsor directly. A hire that checks boxes for the investment committee but doesn't have the trust and alignment of the day-to-day leadership team will not last.
The cost of a failed US expansion hire is not just the search fee and the first-year comp. It's the time lost — often twelve to eighteen months — while the company cycles through the wrong hire and starts the process again. In a funded environment where every quarter matters, that is a significant portion of the runway.
The companies that get the US expansion hire right the first time do a few things consistently: they define the profile with specificity before they start the search, they resist the temptation to hire on logo familiarity, they calibrate compensation against real US market data, and they work with a search partner who has genuine experience in this specific context.
Cross-border expansion is hard enough. The GTM hire doesn't have to be.
Work With Us
We run retained searches for PE- and VC-backed B2B software companies. Let's talk about your mandate.